About Me

Name:ScarletPimpernel
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Hardy Poem for New Year

Thomas Hardy is underrated as a poet/author to us common folk.  He was a great poet AND a great author.  Think about that for a minute.  How many people excel at both arts?  I think of Shakespeare, of course, right away.  Then I have to strain my literature major's brain for more.  Edgar A. Poe.  That's two.  Anyway, I'll leave the pondering to you, dear reader.  In the meantime enjoy   The Darkling Thrush.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Two Kinds of Liberals

I was reading one of HH's blogs and one of the notorious commentors stated something to the effect that conservatism is the "nationalism" of white people. I disagree.  Most normal people are naturally conservative. One has to learn to be liberal.  If conservatism is the "nationalism" of white people, then the inference is that other folks are not conservative and thus liberal. I submit that Liberalism is the preference of 2 types of people. Rich rich white guilty people and less rich touchy feely guilty white people.

The RRWGPs feel guilty about their good fortune (forget that most of the family fortunes were probably earned at some point in history) so they feel EVERYONE should give back.  They are also lazy.  Instead of showing others how to make money and live smart, they let the government do it for them. They will give the shirt off their neighbor's back.  Ah, guilt absolved.

The LRTFGWPs are a little more diversified.  They can be hippies, college students, bums or other types of anti-social folk. They live in your neighborhood.  Whereas the rich don't really care at all about why the poor are poor, the LRTFGWPs feel bad for others because the others are not as smart as the LRTFGWPs.  And, therefore, that's why the others are poor. The LRTFGWPs also have a special envy which turns to hate at anyone who is successful and enjoying life.  If you are rich and don't express remorse for it - oooohhhh watch out for the wrath of the LRTFGWPs! They especially hate those who have.  Their solution is to take it and distribute it to others to make things fair. This, of course, brings everyone down.  That's the way they like it.

Question: Has anyone known a black person to feel guilty when they get a lot of money?  Hmmm.

If you ask blacks why they vote Democrat, considering that socially the Democrats are far from what blacks believe in, the black voter will say, "I hate Bush. I don't trust Republicans".  So it is not like they are really liberal but where can they go? 

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Danny Obama

I was just thinking (again) how awesome America could be if the DinoMedia would live up to what they purport to be.  Impartial. Fair-minded.  Anti-Racist.  But alas, they can't see how patronizing they are when it comes to Barack Obama.  

Here we have a Senator from the Midwest.  Most folks would say he's a decent man, a good family man.  He's intelligent, well educated, and handsome in that "for a politician" sort of way.  Senator Obama has a thin record of accomplishment thus far.  He is not outstanding.  Except that he is black.  Half-black actually.  This is the key to his appeal.  The press loves him and will prop him up so that he can be the First Black President.  Why don't they just come out and say it?

If Obama were 100% white would we even know who he is?  If he were white and it was 1987 Barack Obama's name would be

Dan Quayle.  

That's right.  A common Senator from the Midwest.  A decent man.  No real accomplishment except for his looks.  

Some might say that Quayle couldn't spell "potatoes" so he's not as smart as Obama.  I say I haven't heard Obama say anything about babymamas and babydaddies yet either; so Obama is not as courageous as Dan Quayle.   

I am a capitalist and I have no problem with Obama using his skin color and position to get to the top.  I just wish the DinoMedia would put their laptops down, step back, and take a look at what they are doing once in a while.  It's obvious to everyone else. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Top Ten Christmas Movies

I thought I'd have trouble coming up with 10 of these babies from memory.  So I did a little search and "Voila".

Here are my Top Ten faves and the really cool website that freshed my memory:

1.  Scrooge  (1951)  Alastair Sim is the greatest Ebenezer ever.  Better than Connery, better than Moore be - oops wrong series.  He clinches the title with his glee upon finding out that he did nae miss Christmas after all!

2.  National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation  (1989)  Ah. The good old days when Chevy was still funny and kept his mouth shut.  So many great lines and facial expressions from the whole cast.  Keep an eye on the shopping scene with Randy Quaid (who should have gotten a best supporting actor nod) and Chevy.  Subtle and hilarious.

Todd, standing next to Margo: "Where you gonna put a tree that large, Griswald?"
Clark: "Why don't you bend over and I'll show you!"
Todd: "You've got a lotta nerve talking to me that way!"
Clark:  "I wasn't talking to you!"

3. A Charlie Brown Christmas  (1965)  I still am moved every time when Linus tells us what it's all about.

4.  It's a Wonderful Life  (1946)  Jimmy Stewart shows us why we love him with his impassioned scenes.  Great story. 

5.  A Christmas Story   (1983)  Hilarious and warm.  This movie makes me nostalgic for a time I never knew.  Very gentle humor and laugh out loud scenes that most people can relate too.  "Mommy's little piggy!"

6.  Dr. Seuss' How the Grinch Stole Christmas  (1966)  Boy is he mean!  Great song.  Great story.  Who doesn't feel sorry for poor little Max trying to pull that sled?

7.  Miracle on 34th Street  (1947)  Finding out that the United States Post Office verified Santa's existence is good enough for me.

8.  Rudolph, the Red-Nosed Reindeer   This movie has everything: the misfit hero deer, the misfit hero dentist, the escape from the snow monster and, Rudolph gets the deer girl.  Very cute and very funny his reaction after she kisses him.

9.   Santa Claus is Comin' to Town (1970)  I love this movie!  I even like the Burgermeister Meisterburger.

10.  Santa Claus Conquers the Martians  (1964)  Hey, I didn't want to throw out the same ol' list as everyone else.  Besides, this is the very first Christmas movie (maybe any movie) that I remember seeing in a movie theatre.  It was made before I was born but obviously was run for a few more years annually in the theater.  I remember it was a huge treat for me and my sister to go see it.  My mom made special arrangements and everything!  We were so excited!  This movie is made for kids. 

Merry Christmas Everyone and God Bless you and yours and Go to church.

Enjoy the fabulous link below:
100 Greatest Christmas Shows
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Big Pants Still Dominate

Well, my Scarlet Challenge is off and wobbling.  I have done next to nothing to reduce my waistline.  Pitiful.  I have never had this problem of getting started before!  I recently started a new job and I work with lots of women.  Mature, married mothers and grandmothers.  And it's the Holidays.  Put 2 and 2 together and you get pie.  So far, here are some of the many wonderful items brought to work by co-workers and customers who love us:  chocolate of all kind from many countries who definitely know how to make chocolate; banana bread, walnut bread, pumpkin bread, cranberry bread, and carrot cake bread, butter and tasty spreads for said bread; nuts, popcorn in giant containers (of course I mix handfuls of the different flavors together!); cake, cookies, and candy of all sorts.  Ah. There, I feel better having given you my excuses. 

What have I done towards reaching my goals?  I've been to the gym twice.  I've cut back, slightly, on breakfast.  I checked out the Sylvester Stallone book Sly Moves which has common sense methods and meals that I can actually stick to.  Sly is incredible.  He is 60 and looks fantastic!  He has been in phenomonal shape for 35 years.  I stay in shape for 35 days in a row and I'm happy as a clam.  I saw L.L. Cool J.'s workout book yesterday.  That dude is ripped!  That one will be for my advanced stages in the spring.  I've bought fruits and veggies and only thrown out 2/3rds of it.  Not bad.  

My wife is encouraging me, God Bless her and praise be.  She also just ignores me when I talk about what I'm gonna do.  Say, fellas, that is motivating for sure when your wife gives you the put-up or shut-up look.  

The fantastic brand new gymnasium will open, supposedly, next week so my excuses are growing thinner than I am.  I have 3 days off this weekend so I'm off to the gym now.  I'm tired of the Marlon Brando moomoo look.  Haha.  More later.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Writer's Great Wall

I am a would-be writer.  What I mean is that I would be a writer if I would be writing consistently and for longer than a page at a time.  Although, in my mind,  I have riveting, rollicking, culture -changing ideas that I just know you'd love to read so that you could improve your lives; I just don't seem to get them down on paper.  I've found that writing a complete story with dialogue, plot, character development and sensibility is actually a skill.  See, an idea is one thing but developing it to a whole story is tough.   So I am just kinda fooling around now to test my skills and have some fun.  I want to practice before trying the real thing.  Like Bill Murray's character says in Stripes, "I'm pacing myself." 

One of the several challenges of novelling that I find is what is my style?  my voice?  Well, right now it is sort of a combination of Hemingway and Elmore Leonard.  Oh, you want me to tell you about the chicken crossing the road? Sure.

Texas Three-Step
by ScarletPimpernel

What it was is the chicken, called Rooster Red, was a two-time loser who just released himself under his own recognizance from the Factory.  Bobbing there, the August sun beating down on him, the road was a wall of Hell's fire that he'd just have to go through for deliverance. 

Death was a great possibility and that's for certain, he thought.

Red knew another chicken, a tough little bantam, who tried to "cross the road" only to die. Alone. In the rain.  

"You gonna make your move soon Hoss?"

Rooster, not particularly surprised by the sudden question turned to look at the lizard.

"Can't go back." he nodded over his shoulder.

"Hmph. Well, I guess I could stand to watch. Again." the lizard said.

"What's your name, friend?" asked Red.

"Allessandro, pal." answered Allessandro.

"Bye. Allessandro."  And Red was gone.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Slow Change of the Heart

So Mitt may be our guy, huh? That is really tough for evangelicals to deal with spiritually.  You know we want badly to vote Republican in any election - even for dogcatcher.  This is a whopper though.  My initial reaction was no way in San Francisco will I be able, by my faith, to vote for a member of what most people believe is a false Church.  It's a big deal to us about deceivers posing as Christians to mislead the people.  This is our suspicion concerning Mormons. I know that sounds harsh but all the evidence I've read makes the LDS confusing at best and rather shady at worst. Mormons, of course, disagree. 

Look here, here, and here for differing perspectives and decide for yourself. 

I have had much correspondence with one particular Mormon and find that I really enjoy our exchanges.  I find him not dangerous at all.  He's smart and funny and quite accomplished. I'm afraid I've been a bit disrespectful to him and other Mormons so I must humbly apologize.  Even though I disagree biblically with his religion I don't think he or Romney are evil.

That does not mean I am convinced to vote for Romney.  But I've read some more and recalled my online friend's correspondence and softened a bit. 

Here's the best take I can give on Mormons:  1. Today's Mormons really do disregard their past.  From what I've gathered they don't worry about their origins. 2. Their current leaders and prophets trump the old ones.  I don't get it either but it is their way.  3. They believe the bible to be altered in translations over the centuries. 4. They function well and are clean cut folks.  5. Orrin Hatch is a favorite of mine and he is Mormon.  I knew this all along but I had to remind myself that he is trustworthy and honorable.  6. They are definitely conservative.

Now, I still don't like them calling themselves Christians but that is their responsibility.  I am not going to concern myself with what they do with their own religion.  I've planted the seed in my friend and am shaking the dust off my feet.  To be fair, I've got some minor problems with other denominations that I could use to rule them out but I have never considered these to be disqualifiers.  And as evangelicals we don't like it when the party ignores us either.  I want to make sure I am being fair, and considerate and democratic to fellow conservatives. 

Am I being altruistic in my slight change of heart?  Not entirely.  As a Christian, my spiritual DNA is linked to Abraham, a shrewd businessman.  He was practical and I doubt he would cut off his nose to spite his face.  We don't want to lose the Mormon block.

I don't mean to be flippant but I noticed God has not smited Utah.  And I haven't seen Romney do one magic trick yet (although I will be watching, oh yes).  God sets up rulers and takes them down.  I will leave it in His capable hands. 
 
Also, I will never vote for a Democrat because that would jepordize my world much worse than a Mormon.  I mean to say that Mormons, straight down the line, hold the same values as most conservatives.  I heard Dennis Prager say that there are about 25 atheists he would vote for over a Democrat and I thought, "Well yes, of course."

So, I will keep praying on it.  I will also work to get a more suitable candidate the bid.  This is purely political at this point as I honestly don't think a Republican from the northeast who used to be pro-choice  is the best way to go.  I think the same about America's mayor whom I also respect as a leader despite his social life.  And the Gingrich.  McCain is a self-obsessed weasel.  Besides, I still think it will be late next year before the party springs a winner on us.  Like Bush in '99.  I guess someone like Sonny Perdue.  
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nailed It part 2

A much longer and detailed example of what I was talking about:

here
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Saviorman" Unnecessarily Offensive

So my wife and I watched Superman Returns on DVD last night.  We usually see special effects big action movies at the theater but we were hesitant about paying money for Superman based on the trailer which included parts of the monologue by Jor-El.  We heard, "They can be a great people, Kal-El, they wish to be. They only lack the light to show the way. For this reason above all, their capacity for good, I have sent them you... my only son."  At the time, sitting in the theater, we felt that this was a strange thing to say in a superhero movie.  It got our guard up. We skipped the movie based on this. 

When it came out on DVD this week we figured surely that was the only questionable line in the movie so we rented it (using our Blockbuster.com home rental movie pass - which is excellent by the way. And no, I am not getting paid to tell you how smart it is to use them).  

Well, the movie was more aggravating then we first suspected.  Superman is supposed to be Jesus Christ in this movie.  He goes away and comes back.  His father says things to him like the following: "You will travel far, my little Kal-El, but we will never leave you-even in the face of our deaths. You will make my strength your own. You will see my life through your eyes, as your life will be seen through mine. The son becomes the father. And the father, the son."  
At one other point Superman says, "I do. I hear everything. You wrote that the world doesn't need a saviour, but every day I hear people crying for one."
The word "savior" is mentioned at least a dozen times.  People all over the world turn to him - this is emphasized.  Lex Luthor steals from "heaven" and tries to become a god himself.  Superman is pierced in his side.  Subtle.  He almost dies (or actually dies - I was getting too aggravated to care at that point) and comes back to life to save everyone.   I assume Lois Lane is Mary Magdeline.
  
We were offended no end at the audacity of the writers and director for putting this garbage in the movie.  I don't throw the term "blasphemous" around lightly but I feel that this was a deliberate attempt to insult Christians and mislead unbelievers or weak Christians.  They hijack the story of Jesus and turn it into a mockery by making a superhero into a savior. 

I am not offended easily either. I understand that much literature uses stories from the bible in their work.  For instance, I greatly appreciate Billy Budd, Sailor by Joseph Conrad.  And I was amused by Scott Stap and his Jesus stylings.  But these examples seem to be done out of respect or reverence of our Savior and not as a substitute.      

I was never a big Superman fan in the first place.  I mean, he's Superman, right?  Unless you have Kryptonite shouldn't he just crush you everytime?  Batman, Spiderman and the Flash were more my style.  They were more normal men who were just extremely strong but had weaknesses that the bad guys could exploit.  I say this to demonstrate that I understand comic superhero lore.  To my recollection Superman did not confuse himself with Jesus.  He was a super man from another planet who loved to help citizens in time of need.  Good guy bad guy stuff. 

In this movie, the director and writers obviously decided to ignore comic book style and cranked out a religious film instead.  This just does not make sense.  Why take a great and beloved story with a long history and insert your own mixed-up theology?  Secularists from Hollywood interpreting the story of Jesus!  Outrageous.  My wife and I kept saying either these guys are sorely ignorant and just did a paste and cut version of what they thought His life would be like as Superman, or they deliberately decided to offend millions of Christians. 

The movie itself is dark.  Dark browns and greys and rainy most of the time.  Even Superman's cape is oxblood colored.  The movie is a downer.  Even when the "Saviorman" is triumpant there is little excitement or joy.  One can follow the plot but it does get murky at times.  Some things are just hard to see due to camerawork or editing. 

Other problems: They took out "Truth, justice and the American way".  Lois Lane apparently is loose because she's not sure if Richard or Superman is the babydaddy.  Superman obviously boinks Lois Lane at some point.  Lois has not married so the boy is illegitimate although mommy and daddy live together.  O Joy!  I just love modern life sometimes.  Superman is a playa!  How disappointing.  

Here's how out of touch the writers are:  the newsroom is massive and filled with reporters.  People everywhere must still read a newspaper in their world. 

Kevin Spacey does an excellent job as Lex Luthor.  He is believable as an amoral evildoer.   Brandon Routh is okay as Superman.  He looks great in tights - if you like that sort of thing.  My body double, you might say.  But I think Superman should be slightly older and more commanding.  As Clark Kent Routh is actually more believable.  He is not commanding enough as Superman, though.    

I don't know about you but when I go see a movie about a superhero I don't need to be offended by jerks or ignorant well-meaning misguided  people stretching their artistic wings.  Just give me the hero's origin, the villain's origin, and bring on the action.  Make it fairly coherent with fight scenes and explosions.  How hard is that to understand?  I've watched Spiderman, Batman, Electra, Daredevil, the Hulk, Fantastic Four, etc without being ticked off once.

Without the Messiah Complex as a major distraction this movie would have worked fine.  The special effects are great, the action is good, the villain is villainous, and the sets are good-looking.  Alas, it is as if the people who created this movie went out of their way to wreck the story.    
  

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »